Grupo de lectura: Ciencia inconsistente y pluralismo científico
|
Del 6 al 17 de junio de 2016, 12:00 a 14:00 hrs. Aula Alejandro Rossi
|
6 de junio
|
PRIEST, G. (2005) “Consistency and the Empirical Sciences” en Doubt Truth to be a Liar.
|
7 de junio
|
BROWN, B. (1990) “How to be realistic about inconsistency in science” en Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (2):281-294.
|
8 y 9 de junio
|
BUENO, O. (1997) “Empirical adequacy: A partial structures approach” en Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (4):585-610.
|
10 de junio
|
ŠESŠELJA, D. (2014) “Concerning Peter Vickers’ Recent Treatment of ‘Paraconsistencitis’” en International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28 (3).
|
13 de junio
|
MEHEUS, J. (2002) “How to Reason Sensibly Yet Naturally from Inconsistencies” en Inconsistency in Science.
|
14 de junio
|
FRIEND, M. (2014) “The Journey from Realism to Pluralism” en Pluralism in Mathematics: A New Position in Philosophy of Mathematics.
|
15 y 16 de junio
|
BATENS, D. (2002) “In Defence of a Programme for Handling Inconsistencies” en Inconsistency in Science.
|
17 de junio
|
MARTÍNEZ-ORDAZ, M. (2016) “Holism, Inconsistency Toleration and Inconsistencies between Theory and Observation”.
|
|
|
Informes: María del Rosario Martínez
(martinezordazm@gmail.com)
|
Actualizado Jun 10 de 2016