UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES FILOSÓFICAS

  20    Giulio Fornaroli (Posdoc-IIFs) [10:00 a 12:00]

“Is There Moral Magic in the Word “Right”? On Rights, Interests, and Wrongs”

  27      [12:00 a 14:00]    Informes: contacto@filosoficas.unam.mx  

Edgar González (IIFs) y Axel Barceló (IIFs)

“El enigma del juicio falso en el Teeteto de Platón”

  Miércoles 12 | AGO   

Transmisión en vivo FilosoficasUnam

canal oficial https://www.youtube.com/c/FilosoficasUnam

Efraín Lazos  (IIFs)

 "Esquemas matemáticos en Kant"

  Miércoles 19 | AGO  

[12:00 a 14:00]	Informes: contacto@filosoficas.unam.mx
	Transmisión en vivo FilosoficasUnam canal oficial https://www.youtube.com/c/FilosoficasUnam

Addison Ellis  (Posdoc IIFs) 

“Kant's Noumenal Ignorance Without Contrary”
 

  Miércoles 2 | SEP  

David Sedley (Universidad de Cambridge)

"Theological Dualism and the Origins of Greek Philosophy"

Moderador: Edgar González Varela

Sarah Hutton (Universidad de York)

"Filling the Gaps: Women, Philosophy, and the History of Philosophy"

Modera: Erika Torres

  Miércoles 23 | SEP  

[12:00 a 14:00]	Informes: contacto@filosoficas.unam.mx
	Transmisión en vivo FilosoficasUnam canal oficial https://www.youtube.com/c/FilosoficasUnam

Luis Estrada (IIFs-UNAM)

"Patrones tabulares"

Modera: Diana Rojas

Resumen: En "Patrones inferenciales", Axel Barceló desarrolla un método para obtener reglas de deducción natural a partir de las tablas de verdad bivaluadas usuales (y viceversa). Con su método, Barceló obtiene un sistema de deducción natural para la lógica clásica. Sin embargo, es bien sabido que las tablas de verdad bivalentes usuales no inducen la lógica clásica sin algunos supuestos adicionales muy sustanciales y ajenos a la representación tabular. En esta plática muestro qué sistema de deducción natural se obtiene siguiendo el método de Barceló sin esos supuestos adicionales y las consecuencia que eso tiene para la solución que Barceló da al problema de tonk.

  Miércoles 30 | SEP  

Maya Goldenberg (Universidad de Guelph)

"A War on Science? The Death of Expertise? Rethinking Vaccine Hesitancy and Refusal"

Maya Goldenberg Department of Philosophy University of Guelph  Because vaccine hesitancy has been framed as a problem of public misunder- standing of science, vaccine outreach has focused on educating the misguided  publics. Where efforts to change vaccine attitudes have failed, cynicism has bred the harsher view that the publics are anti-science and anti-expertise. Yet  research into science and the publics lends strong support to the view that pub- lic attitudes regarding scientific claims turn crucially on epistemic trust rather  than engagement with science itself. It follows that it is poor trust in the expert sources that engender vaccine hesitancy.
    This consideration redraws the lines of responsibility, where vaccine hesi- tancy signals a problem with scientific governance rather than a problem with  the wayward publics. In order to improve vaccine communications, we should focus on building that trust rather than educating the misinformed publics or puzzling over the moral and epistemic failings of the publics. Doing this does not discount that public health agencies have the science on their sides. It does mean recognizing that the best science is not enough to ensure public uptake of health recommendations.

Modera: María Martínez-Ordaz

  Miércoles 7 | OCT  

Jessica Moss (Universidad de Nueva York)

“Aristotle´s  Theory of Knowledge”

  Miércoles 14 | OCT  

[12:00 a 14:00]	Informes: contacto@filosoficas.unam.mx
	Transmisión en vivo FilosoficasUnam canal oficial Enlace https://www.youtube.com/c/FilosoficasUnam https://www.facebook.com/FilosoficasUNAM

Paulette Dieterlen  (IIFs) 

¿Por qué no podemos todo con dinero? “Mercado y moral”

  Miércoles 21 | OCT  

CANCELADO

[12:00 a 14:00]	Informes: contacto@filosoficas.unam.mx
	Transmisión en vivo FilosoficasUnam canal oficial https://www.youtube.com/c/FilosoficasUnam

Andrea Onofri  (Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí)

“De la identidad a la coordinación”

  Miércoles 28 | OCT  

Amalia Amaya (IIFs)

“Admiration, Exemplarity, and Judicial Virtue”

Abstract. A principal venue for the acquisition of judicial virtue is the emulation of exemplary judges. Such emulation is triggered by the emotion of admiration, which thus plays a critical role in the development of judicial virtue. In this chapter, I first examine the emotion of admiration. Next, I explain how it motivates the emulation of exemplars and ultimately leads to the acquisition of judicial virtue as well as the ways in which this process from admiration to virtue may go wrong. In addition to it being crucial for emulation, admiration also plays important social functions within the judiciary. After explaining the beneficial social effects of admiration, the chapter concludes by discussing some implications for legal education.

  Miércoles 4 | NOV  

[12:00 a 14:00]	Informes: contacto@filosoficas.unam.mx
	Transmisión en vivo FilosoficasUnam canal oficial https://www.youtube.com/c/FilosoficasUnam

Andrea Onofri  (Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí)

“De la identidad a la coordinación”

  Miércoles 11 | NOV  

Diana Pérez (Universidad de Buenos Aires)
y Carolina Scotto (Universidad Nacional de Córdoba)

“La cuestión del lenguaje inclusivo a la luz de la hipótesis del relativismo linguístico”

  Miércoles 18 | NOV  

Oliver R. Marshall ( Estancia Posdoctoral IIFs)

"Magnitudes, Ratios and Real Numbers"

  Miércoles 25 | NOV  

Abraham Sapién ( Estancia Posdoctoral IIFs)

"Zozobra: the feeling of not belonging"